1,506
25
Analysis Paper, 2 pages (300 words)

Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society

Symbolic interactionism is a social psychological theory developed from the work George Herbert Mead in the early part of the twentieth century. According to this theory, people inhabit a world that is in large part socially constructed. In particular, the meaning of objects, events, and behaviors comes from the interpretation people give them, and interpretations vary from one group to another. There are three main elements to symbolic interactionism: 1.

The symbol: Symbolic interactionism assumes that individuals place meanings on objects in theenvironment, and it is these meanings that determine their behavior. Mead claims that for sense to be made of the real world and the actions of other individuals there must be shared symbols. The world is, therefore, made up of symbols that are created by humans to give meaning or order in society. 2. The Self: Mead refers to persons in society as ‘ actors’. He believes that we assert ourselves through social construction in a social process where individuals interact and internalize how they are perceived. Their notion of self is referred by him as ‘ I’ and the notion that others perceive us is ‘ Me’.

The process of interpretation of meanings in deemed ‘ role-taking’. Mead argues that through the process of role-taking individuals develop a concept of ‘ self’. 3. The Interaction: Interaction is not possible according to Mead unless individuals are aware of the intention of others. The process ‘ role-taking’ involves one person taking on the role of another by imaginatively placing themselves in the position of the person with whom they are interacting. Game stage * Fist= anger * Smile= happinessSymbolic Interactionism emphasizes three principles: 1. Ascribed Meanings: The actions of human beings are based on the meanings that they ascribe to objects or things.

2. Communication: The meanings which individuals place on things have evolved out of their interaction and contact with other individuals. 3. Interpretation: the individual undertakes an interpretive process through which the individual assigns meanings to the things in the environment.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society. Page 1
Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society. Page 2
Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society. Page 3

This work, titled "Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Analysis Paper

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society'. 3 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 3). Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/analysis-of-symbolic-interactionism-in-a-society/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/analysis-of-symbolic-interactionism-in-a-society/.

1. AssignBuster. "Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/analysis-of-symbolic-interactionism-in-a-society/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/analysis-of-symbolic-interactionism-in-a-society/.

Work Cited

"Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society." AssignBuster, 3 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/analysis-of-symbolic-interactionism-in-a-society/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Analysis of symbolic interactionism in a society, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]