Research Paper, 2 pages (350 words)

Case ethics

Advertising We'll write a high-quality original custom paper on Case ethics just for you with a 15% discount for the 1st order Use a Discount Use a Discount

Running Head: Case Ethics

Case Brief

McNeil PPC, Inc. v. Pfizer Corporation

351 F. SUPP. 2D 226 (S. D. N. Y. 2005)

Facts: McNeil PPC, Inc., the market leader and manufacturer of dental floss, is challenging Pfizer Corporation’s claim in its marketing campaign that their new mouthwash Listerine is equally effective as floss in cleaning plaque and gingivitis present between the teeth. Pfizer supports this argument through two clinical studies conducted for them. ADA recommends using Dental floss for cleaning plaque from between the teeth. However, consumers find it difficult to use floss. Since the time of launch of the mouthwash, sales of dental floss have declined. The studies conducted by Pfizer excluded people suffering from severe gingivitis.

Decision Below: The district judge ruled in favor of McNeil PPC, Inc. and granted injunction to stop Pfizer from running the advertisements. (Jennings)

Legal Issue: Is Pfizer’sadvertisementcampaign of Listerine misleading consumers in believing that it is as effective as a dental floss for cleaning between teeth and posing a publichealthrisk?


Affirmed Analysis: The visuals in the advertisement and claims based on the two sponsored clinical studies mislead the consumers into believing that the liquid mouthwash is just as effective in cleaning plaque and gingivitis as dental floss is. However, the ADA thinks otherwise and still recommends using dental floss. The advertisement campaign posed a public health risk by undermining the efforts of dental professionals and ADA to encourage use of dental floss to improve dental health of general public. The clinical studies conducted to support the claim provide inadequate proof to support the claim. Broad generalizations have been drawn based on the results of these studies, hence they cannot be claimed to be true.

Personal Opinion: I agree with the court’s decision to grant injunction to stop Pfizer from running the advertisement campaign. Although Pfizer did use a caution note in its campaign, but Pfizer was implicitly claiming that the mouthwash was as effective as dental floss which is not true. The clinical studies are not representative of the real world scenario hence cannot be relied upon.


Jennings, M. M. Business, its legal, Ethical and GlobalEnvironment. Cengage Learning.

Thanks for voting and helping us improve!
Case ethics. Page 1
Case ethics. Page 2
Case ethics. Page 3

The paper "Case ethics" was contributed to our database by a real student. You can use this work as a reference for your own writing or as a starting point for your research. You must properly cite any portion of this sample before using it.

If this work is your intellectual property and you no longer would like it to appear in our database, please request its deletion.

Ask for Removal

Create a Citation on Research Paper


PaperPrompt. (2021) 'Case ethics'. 27 November.


PaperPrompt. (2021, November 27). Case ethics. Retrieved from https://paperprompt.com/case-ethics/


PaperPrompt. 2021. "Case ethics." November 27, 2021. https://paperprompt.com/case-ethics/.

1. PaperPrompt. "Case ethics." November 27, 2021. https://paperprompt.com/case-ethics/.


PaperPrompt. "Case ethics." November 27, 2021. https://paperprompt.com/case-ethics/.

Work Cited

"Case ethics." PaperPrompt, 27 Nov. 2021, paperprompt.com/case-ethics/.

Get in Touch with Us

Do you have more ideas on how to improve Case ethics? Please share them with us by writing at the [email protected]