1,172
13
Essay, 2 pages (450 words)

Discharge for whistleblower activity

Advertising We'll write a high-quality original custom paper on Discharge for whistleblower activity just for you with a 15% discount for the 1st order Use a Discount Use a Discount

1. Yes, the federal appeals court should deny Broom and Miller’s appeal. This federal appeals court must uphold the verdict of the district court’s finding. The state district court chose to uphold the discharge of the two whistle blowers. Because the employees had to follow the Oklahoma common law employment-at-will doctrine, this means they could be discharged by their employer for any reason. This doctrine gives an employer full control over whether or not to dismiss them because of their insubordination. Broom and Miller made the right choice in deciding to report the suspected worker of falsifying medical drug books in order to cover up the theft that she had carried out against the facility managers. However, Broom and Miller chose not to follow standard procedure and instead of going to the accused employee’s immediate supervisor, they went the medication consultant at the facility. Their reasoning was based on the fact that the accused employee had a close personal friendship with her immediate supervisor, Sarah Dutton. The act that Broom and Miller carried out went against protocol. Because these two employees did not follow the proper chain of command and protocol in choosing to file their complaint, this only gave their employer’s legal position more support.
2. Because Broom and Miller were subject to the employment-at-will doctrine, even if they had been members of a bargaining unit that was connected with union representation, it still would not have provided any advantage to their case. The reality is that these employees could not be protected under a collective bargaining agreement because Oklahoma common law gives the right to employees to discharge at at-will employee at any time of their choosing. Broom and Miller attempted to argue their case by citing the three statutory laws that they thought supported their actions. These three laws were the Nursing Home Care Act, the Residential Care Act, and the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act. This first statutory law governed safeguards and procedures for the storage, safekeeping, monitoring, dispensing, and destruction of patient prescription drugs. The employer argued that this only covered nursing homes within the state and that the employer’s company is legally a residential care facility and cannot be included in the law. The second statutory law does apply to the employer’s facility because the employer admitted so. However, the employer argued that the language in this law were general and did not cover the Oklahoma employment-at-will doctrine. Finally, the third law makes it a criminal offence to steal controlled and dangerous substances, but Broom and Miller did not make a specific argument to justify their claims. Reaffirming what was said in the previous question, Broom and Miller failed to follow the proper procedures when filing their complaint. This only increased their already precarious legal position.

Thanks for voting and helping us improve!
Discharge for whistleblower activity. Page 1
Discharge for whistleblower activity. Page 2
Discharge for whistleblower activity. Page 3

The paper "Discharge for whistleblower activity" was contributed to our database by a real student. You can use this work as a reference for your own writing or as a starting point for your research. You must properly cite any portion of this sample before using it.

If this work is your intellectual property and you no longer would like it to appear in our database, please request its deletion.

Ask for Removal

Create a Citation on Essay

References

PaperPrompt. (2022) 'Discharge for whistleblower activity'. 31 January.

Reference

PaperPrompt. (2022, January 31). Discharge for whistleblower activity. Retrieved from https://paperprompt.com/discharge-for-whistleblower-activity/

References

PaperPrompt. 2022. "Discharge for whistleblower activity." January 31, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/discharge-for-whistleblower-activity/.

1. PaperPrompt. "Discharge for whistleblower activity." January 31, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/discharge-for-whistleblower-activity/.


Bibliography


PaperPrompt. "Discharge for whistleblower activity." January 31, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/discharge-for-whistleblower-activity/.

Work Cited

"Discharge for whistleblower activity." PaperPrompt, 31 Jan. 2022, paperprompt.com/discharge-for-whistleblower-activity/.

Get in Touch with Us

Do you have more ideas on how to improve Discharge for whistleblower activity? Please share them with us by writing at the [email protected]