1,904
21
Essay, 2 pages (350 words)

Employment law 1

Employment law Introduction Bobby Randall was hired at Wal-Mart in 1997 without any criminal proceedings but had previously being convicted three times on misdemeanor charges for independent exposure. At the time of hiring, Wal-Mart did not have any employment policy requiring Wal-Mart to check the prior criminal convictions of Bobby. In September, 2000, Bobby was accused of folding 10-year old girl while working at Wal-Mart stores. The girl’s mother has sued Wal-Mart for negligent hiring claiming that Wal-Mart store should have known Bobby status as a sex offender through a background check.
In the above case, Wal-Mart is not liable for any offense since US constitution protects employees with criminal background from any form of discriminatory practices in employment matters. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 prohibits all forms of employment discrimination on the basis of national origin, religion, color, or race (Repa 15). In the above case, Wal-Mart had no hiring policy requiring the criminal background of the potential employees. In the case, Bobby has only previous being convicted of a misdemeanor and not rape. However, Wal-Mart can implement a policy to request the criminal background of employees, but it must put into consideration the nature of job, the gravity of past convicted offense and time lapse since the offense before making the hiring decision (Repa 67). Wal-Mart is not liable for not requesting the criminal background of Bobby since no employment law requires the company to do so. Equal employment opportunity guidelines require all employees to avoid or minimize requesting the criminal background of employees since this may lead to discrimination in employment practices (Walsh 163).
Under Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines, Wal-Mart is not supposed to deny Bobby the employment opportunity even if the company has a policy on employee criminal background screening except when the crime is job-related (Walsh 162). Wal-Mart is not liable for any offense in hiring Bobby considering no hiring policy that requires the background checks of employees and the nature of past convictions and the current allegations of rape.
Works cited:
Repa, Barbara. Your rights in workplace. Berkeley. Nolo. 2010.
Walsh, David. Employment law for human resource practice. Mason. Cengage Learning. 2012.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Employment law 1. Page 1
Employment law 1. Page 2
Employment law 1. Page 3

This work, titled "Employment law 1" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Employment law 1'. 19 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 19). Employment law 1. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/employment-law-1/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Employment law 1." September 19, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employment-law-1/.

1. AssignBuster. "Employment law 1." September 19, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employment-law-1/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Employment law 1." September 19, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/employment-law-1/.

Work Cited

"Employment law 1." AssignBuster, 19 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/employment-law-1/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Employment law 1, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]