1,963
4
Essay, 3 pages (550 words)

Philosephy

Philosophy: Kant PHILOSOPHY: KANT The Prolegomena are a form of introductory examinations that have been designed as a type of preparatory exercise. Through a clear description of what has to be dome for a possible science to be made actual, these exercises will aid, in the preparation for the scientific metaphysics, to become viable. The main intent behind Kant’s work is to provide a method that can be used to discover metaphysics as a science. Therefore, Kant intends for his work to be used by future teachers, especially those who will develop metaphysics’ content through the application of the method, instead of for the present apprentices or students. He also intends that his work will be used by anatomists of reason away from historical knowledge. Because the content of his work is something new, Kant contends that the time for philosophical historians will come after critics and anatomists are done with their work. His intent behind writing this essay is to show that metaphysics requires openness in order to get fresh insights, rather than its reduction to something already known in scientific circles. Simply, Kant intends to restrict metaphysical investigations to the knowledge and experience that will make it actual or possible.
The question on whether a science is possible shows that there is doubt about its actuality. The metaphysics that Kant refers to is only possible through virtue of its existence, as well as what he calls illusionary knowledge, which works to render it unviable as a science. Kant proposes several conditions that must be satisfied for a possible science like metaphysics to become actual science. He contends that possible science must have universal recognition with its validity being a major feature. He also says that possible science must have lasting recognition with featured acceptance in order for it to be considered actual science, while it should also undergo continual advancement and cumulative progress. Finally, possible science should also possess standards of knowledge that aid in discrimination of ignorance. There needs to be a careful and accurate investigation of pure reason’s existing critique, which, if absent, should render all pretensions of the possible science impractical. The modern idea of science is that there should be knowledge that is experimentally verifiable and methodical, which are the critical factors and conditions of an actual science.
Kant argues that it is no possible to extend knowledge to speculative metaphysics, which is a super-sensible realm in his words. He argues that knowledge is possessed of these constraints because the mind has an active part to play in the constitution of experience, while its access is limited to the empirical field of time and space. One reason that the conditions mentioned above render metaphysics impossible as a science is because it does not possess universal and long-lasting recognition or universal validity. This means that the public does not externally approve it, while the scientific community does not have an internal consensus about it. A second reason why the conditions render metaphysics impossible, as a science is that it does not produce results, let alone progress. Metaphysics at this time was still in the same place it was during Aristotle’s time. In addition, its lack of a criterion to distinguish ignorance from sound knowledge renders it impossible as a science. This defect is actually the most severe for metaphysics because it accounts for the fact that anyone has the right to pass judgment, meaning there is lack of expertise regarding knowledge in metaphysics.
References
Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Raleigh, N. C.: Alex Catalogue. 2012.

Thank's for Your Vote!
Philosephy. Page 1
Philosephy. Page 2
Philosephy. Page 3
Philosephy. Page 4

This work, titled "Philosephy" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Philosephy'. 27 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 27). Philosephy. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/philosephy/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Philosephy." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosephy/.

1. AssignBuster. "Philosephy." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosephy/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Philosephy." September 27, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosephy/.

Work Cited

"Philosephy." AssignBuster, 27 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/philosephy/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Philosephy, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]