1,072
18
Essay, 3 pages (550 words)

Philosophy unit 5

Circumstantial Freedomfree from external forces and outer limitations
-example: free to walk outside
-example: not free to dunk a basketball. Circumstance defines your freedomMetaphysical Freedomfree from internal forces or any limitations
-example: free to think
-But are we really allowed to think?
-example: Am I a philosphy teacher because of all my life experiences?
-example of what not-not free to choose my height
-biological, metaphysical or etc that are contributing to my freedomDeterminismthat every event including every human action is a necessary result of prior causes. Hard Determinismthis Determinism is true and there is no free will
-what i choose to do is determined by prior events, or biologies or other forces
-Either determined or I have free will
-we are not morally responsible since we’re not free
-have no problem with mental illness go, shouldn’t be held responsible for killing if one is insane or mentally disabled. Soft determinism-Determinism is true and internal causes are free
-a person is real inside themselves
-we are morally responsible
-Determinism and free will are compatibleBaron Paul HenriSystems of Nature
He argues that human beings are wholly physical entities and therefore wholly subject to the laws of nature.
We have free will (views as modifications of the brain) but our free will is not free because it necessarily seeks our well-being and self preservation.
Every human action, just like every other occurence in nature is ” a necessary consequence of causes, visible or concealed, that are forced to act according to their proper natures” WT Stacehe says Actions are determined and free (if ” free” means caused by psychological state of the agent.
I am free to choose and determined at the same time
Free will means indeterminismNancy Holmstrom-” firms up” soft determinism
-modifies Stace’s theory: claims that an action caused by a psychological state free only if the person has control over that state.
-control need not be all or nothing; it is often a matter of degree
-we have at least some control over many of our beliefs and desires, many of our actions are free to some extent.
-Human freedom is closely tied to social and political freedomCompatibilism-determinism might be true
-free will is true
-differences with soft determinism is commitment to determinism (might or might not be true) Soft determinism is true. Harry Franfurt-wrote On bullshit
-We need to say we are free to account for morality
-PAP: principle of alternative possibilities-how we should hold ourselves morally responsibleLibertarianism-human beings can, in some situations, make free choices.
-different from political use; both related to freedom
-Determinism is false
-Free will is real or true
-Free will and determinism are incompatibleWilliam Jamespresents an indeterminist defense of libertarianism. Since we can’t prove neither determinism (hard or soft) nor indeterminism, indeterminism is more plausible because it is a better judgement of regret. Richard Taylor” Freedom and Determinism” – defends libertarism – does not believe in soft determinism
-addresses the question of whether any of our actions are free
-He rejects soft determinism because saying that a person’s action was free implies that he or she could have acted otherwise
-Also rejects simple indeterminism (free will) because it is at odds with our ordinary notion of responsiblity.
-” theory of agency”-free actions are those caused by the person (agent). A free action is not caused by something within the person (desire) but by the person as a whole. Incoherentism-the idea of free will is contradictory or incoherent
-free will is impossible… no free will
-determinism might be true or false
-unpopular position ONPHILOSOPHY UNIT 5 SPECIFICALLY FOR YOUFOR ONLY$13. 90/PAGEOrder Now

Thank's for Your Vote!
Philosophy unit 5. Page 1
Philosophy unit 5. Page 2
Philosophy unit 5. Page 3
Philosophy unit 5. Page 4

This work, titled "Philosophy unit 5" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Essay

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Philosophy unit 5'. 3 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 3). Philosophy unit 5. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-unit-5/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Philosophy unit 5." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-unit-5/.

1. AssignBuster. "Philosophy unit 5." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-unit-5/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Philosophy unit 5." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/philosophy-unit-5/.

Work Cited

"Philosophy unit 5." AssignBuster, 3 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/philosophy-unit-5/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Philosophy unit 5, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]