1,773
23
Review, 2 pages (350 words)

The american sociological review

The American Sociological Review of Article: Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same-and cross-gender aggression
Authors: Robert Faris and Diane Felmlee
Source: American Sociological Review, 76, 1, 2011.
In this case study, Robert Faris and Diane Felmlee evaluates aggression from a social network point of view. Unlike earlier studies and literature that posits that aggressive behavior is caused by individual differences such as troublesome home environments, psychological difficulties and incompetence, the researchers argue that aggression capacity is increased by individuals’ primary measure of peer pressure based on its centrality in human beings social network. In addition, they suggest that aggression is motivated by competition to maintain or gain status (Faris & Felmlee, 2011).
In order to verify their argument, a unique longitudinal method of sampling was employed where each dataset of respondents facilitated consideration of both the same same-and cross-gender aggression. The survey involved a study of adolescents in three countries at an interval of six month from the springs of 2002 and was completed in the fall of 2005 (Faris & Felmlee, 2011). In regards to this study, the authors found out that rather than the perceived maladjusted reaction associated with social marginal, aggression is inherent to the status and rises with progression in peer status until actualization is attained based on the social hierarchy. As a result, intensity of aggression is least recorded among people at both extremes of the hierarchy (Archier & Coyne, 2005).
Moreover, the researchers notes that an individual’s gender differences have less influence on their aggression level as opposed to their effect on their interactions with other gender and forms of gender isolation at school. It is worth noting that aggression is diminished by abundance of cross-gender relationships (Archier & Coyne, 2005). Robert Faris and Diane Felmlee point out that status distinction is established by cross-gender friendships hence magnifying network centrality consequences (Faris & Felmlee, 2011). Nevertheless, in my own opinion, the study would have been better if the researchers had included forms of aggression, frequency of occurrence, and gender factors.
References
Archier, J. & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect relational and social aggression. Pers Soc Psychology rev, 9 (3), 212-230.
Faris, R. & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same-and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48-73.

Thank's for Your Vote!
The american sociological review. Page 1
The american sociological review. Page 2
The american sociological review. Page 3

This work, titled "The american sociological review" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Review

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'The american sociological review'. 29 September.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, September 29). The american sociological review. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/the-american-sociological-review/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "The american sociological review." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-american-sociological-review/.

1. AssignBuster. "The american sociological review." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-american-sociological-review/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "The american sociological review." September 29, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/the-american-sociological-review/.

Work Cited

"The american sociological review." AssignBuster, 29 Sept. 2022, assignbuster.com/the-american-sociological-review/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving The american sociological review, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]