- Published: August 1, 2022
- Updated: August 1, 2022
- University / College: UCL
- Level: Master's
- Language: English
- Downloads: 21
United s of America v. Jeffrey Brian Ziegler Ziegler, an employee of Frontline Processing, had been convicted of processing and photo of child pornography. His company, as well as the government agent, gave evidence that lead to his conviction of a two year in prison and a fine of $1000 (Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana). However, before sentencing Ziegler had tried to suppress the case by arguing that the evidence that was put before the court was un-procedurally collected. He argued that his right to privacy were violated and thus contravened the right given in the constitution under the Fourth Amendment. However, his plea for suppression of his case was thrown out after it was argued that the office and an office computer does not belong to a person but it is an entity for the employer. The appellate argued that the employer pays the rent for the office and supply computer to his employee (Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana).
Nevertheless, after Ziegler was convicted he appealed the ruling in the Ninth Circuit court. The court overturned the decision of the lower court by arguing that Ziegler right were contravened when his office machine was searched without his notice or a search warrant. The judge said that Ziegler office attracted privacy as he did not share it with other employees. The court argued “ Because Ziegler had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his office, any search of that space and the items located therein must comply with the Fourth Amendment” (Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana). In conclusion, I do agree with the decision of the Ninth Circuit court that privacy in the office also is protected in the Fourth Amended.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. No. 474 F. 3d 1184. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 30 January 2007. Print.
The paper "United states v. ziegler" was contributed to our database by a real student. You can use this work as a reference for your own writing or as a starting point for your research. You must properly cite any portion of this sample before using it.
If this work is your intellectual property and you no longer would like it to appear in our database, please request its deletion.Ask for Removal
Create a Citation on Essay
PaperPrompt. (2022) 'United states v. ziegler'. 1 August.
PaperPrompt. (2022, August 1). United states v. ziegler. Retrieved from https://paperprompt.com/united-states-v-ziegler/
PaperPrompt. 2022. "United states v. ziegler." August 1, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/united-states-v-ziegler/.
1. PaperPrompt. "United states v. ziegler." August 1, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/united-states-v-ziegler/.
PaperPrompt. "United states v. ziegler." August 1, 2022. https://paperprompt.com/united-states-v-ziegler/.
"United states v. ziegler." PaperPrompt, 1 Aug. 2022, paperprompt.com/united-states-v-ziegler/.
Get in Touch with Us
Do you have more ideas on how to improve United states v. ziegler? Please share them with us by writing at the [email protected]