1,586
22
Article, 3 pages (650 words)

Cyperethics

Philosophy Philosophy 3. Explain the objection, on p. 5 of our excerpt of Utilitarianism, that Utilitarianism is a ” doctrine worthy only of pigs”. Also, what is Mills first response to this objection?
Mill responds to this objection by illustrating that the opponents of utilitarianism are the ones guilty of viewing humans as lesser beings at a similar level with pigs. He highlights that, the desires of a pig are of a lower level compared to those of human beings. Therefore, it is senseless to compare the needs and desires of human beings to those of beasts (Mill, 2008).
4. On p. 6 of our excerpt from Utilitarianism, Mill writes, that it is ” compatible with the principle of utility to recognize that some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others.” There is a difference between quality and quantity of pleasure. Explain this difference, and the role this difference plays in his theory. Also, make sure to explain how, according to Mill, one can tell whether a pleasure is higher or lower quality.
When Mill says this, he refers to the existing difference between the amount of pleasure and the level of value each type of pleasure may have. In this case, quantity motivates some people to choose a certain pleasure while quality may motivate others to choose a different type of pleasure because of the value attached to it. He explains that, it is possible to determine pleasure of low or high quality (Mill, 2008). If a certain type of pleasure (P1) is preferred by people, irrespective of its low amount compared to a higher amount of a different pleasure (P2), then it means that P1 is of a higher value compared to P2.
5. At the beginning of chapter 2 of Utilitarianism, Mill discusses one criticism of his view which he calls an ” ignorant blunder.” Explain this criticism and his answer to it.
Mill refers to the argument of opponents of utilitarianism that utility is opposed to pleasure as an ignorant blunder. This is because it is evident that utilitarianism seeks to consider pleasure itself as well as a condition free of pain and does not oppose it (Mill, 2008). This is the reason why he considers it a measure of ignorance to claim that utilitarianism is against pleasure.
6. Kant argues that false promises (promises you have no intention of keeping) are morally wrong. Explain why he thinks they are wrong based on his first formulation of the Categorical Imperative (it is in bold on p. 24 from our excerpt).
According to Kant’s first formulation of the categorical imperative, it is wrong to give false promises when one is aware that he or she may not fulfill them. This is because the formulation says “ Act as though the maxim of your action were to become, through your will, a universal law of nature.” Since an individual wouldn’t want giving false promises to become a universal law of nature, he or she should focus on keeping promises as that would be a productive universal law of nature (Kant, 2008).
7. Explain Kants second formulation of the Categorical Imperative. In particular, explain how it works, and his reasons in favour of it (it is bold on p. 29 from our excerpt).
Kant’s second formulation of the categorical imperative states that, “ act in such a way as to treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of anyone else, always as an end and never merely as a means”. Evidently, Kant sought to highlight that human beings should not be exploited in any way, but should be accorded respect as an end itself. This means that, human life should be respected and not compromised in any way. When making any decision, humanity should be regarded highly and human life given a priority (Kant, 2008).
Reference
Kant, I. (2008). Ground work for the metaphysic of morals. Retrieved on 6th July 2014 from www. earlymoderntexts. com
Mill, J. S. (2008). Utilitarianism. Retrieved on 6th July 2014 from www. earlymoderntexts. com

Thank's for Your Vote!
Cyperethics. Page 1
Cyperethics. Page 2
Cyperethics. Page 3
Cyperethics. Page 4

This work, titled "Cyperethics" was written and willingly shared by a fellow student. This sample can be utilized as a research and reference resource to aid in the writing of your own work. Any use of the work that does not include an appropriate citation is banned.

If you are the owner of this work and don’t want it to be published on AssignBuster, request its removal.

Request Removal
Cite this Article

References

AssignBuster. (2022) 'Cyperethics'. 3 October.

Reference

AssignBuster. (2022, October 3). Cyperethics. Retrieved from https://assignbuster.com/cyperethics-article-samples/

References

AssignBuster. 2022. "Cyperethics." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/cyperethics-article-samples/.

1. AssignBuster. "Cyperethics." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/cyperethics-article-samples/.


Bibliography


AssignBuster. "Cyperethics." October 3, 2022. https://assignbuster.com/cyperethics-article-samples/.

Work Cited

"Cyperethics." AssignBuster, 3 Oct. 2022, assignbuster.com/cyperethics-article-samples/.

Get in Touch

Please, let us know if you have any ideas on improving Cyperethics, or our service. We will be happy to hear what you think: [email protected]